buphalaphus asked: Lavey attributed man having "become the most vicious animal of all" to our "divine spiritual and intellectual development". What is your take on this "divine spiritual and intellectual development" he referred to? Is this a mockery of the notion that we are so divinely, spiritually and intellectually developed at all just because we share a common vicious nature with other animals? A point about how intellectual and what are considered "divine spiritual" developments guide this viciousness (ie Holy wars, war in general)?
For those who may not be getting what is being called to question here, it’s the seventh Satanic statement:
“Satan represents man as just another animal, sometimes better, more often worse than those that walk on all-fours, who, because of his “divine spiritual and intellectual development,” has become the most vicious animal of all!”
Personally, I think you’re over-analyzing it a bit.
My take on what is being said is that humans are more often worse than “those who walk on all fours” due to humanity’s straying from natural paths of behavior. That we, as a species, have wasted far too much time dabbling into a logical negative and being brainwashed by those who manipulate it (and us) to their will that we’ve warped our own sense of right and wrong.
I believe I can sum up my answer with this:
“Later when I saw them hauling away the whale away I said “why are we killing these whales? Why are the Soviets killing those whales?” They weren’t eating the sperm whale meat; they were making spermicidal oil, which is used for.. as a lubrication oil, for heavy, heat-resistant machinery. And one of the things that they were using spermicidal oil in was the production and manufacture of intercontinental ballistic missiles. I said here we are destroying this incredibly intelligent, socially complex, gentle creature for the purpose of making a weapon meant for the mass extermination of human beings. That’s when it struck me: we were insane. […] as a species, we’re insane.” —Paul Watson, founder of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society.
A lot of people are hit and miss with their opinions of Paul and I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t skeptical of his actions at times too… but from my close observations, I believe him to be one of the “better” animals.
Hope I could shed some light your way.
Thanks for asking.
Invictvs